Post Info TOPIC: Dr Rondberg Responds

Dr Rondberg Responds

It is unfortunate that Dr. Patrick Gentempo is trying to divert attention away from the charges of false advertising and fraud by saying that the recent news reports about CLA are "unfounded attacks" on him. Rather than confront the real issues, he is using emotional manipulation to get doctors to support him.

There is no "conspiracy" or "smear campaign" against Dr. Gentempo or his company. There is no malice involved. What possible motive would state boards, NASA, the Senate, and The Chiropractic Journal have for such an action? The sole purpose of publishing the report by Dr. David Marcarian was to inform the profession of serious allegations about certain advertising claims being used by CLA and some of its clients.
Please, read the original article and you'll see for yourself that the investigation does NOT involve the Subluxation Station itself, CLA or its leaders. It focuses ONLY on certain advertising claims that are being scrutinized by state boards. Also keep in mind that The Chiropractic Journal contacted Dr. Gentempo prior to publishing the report and asked him to provide his side of the story. He refused to do so.
Now, let's take a few minutes to review Dr. Gentempo's recent response to the Journal article. His statements are in black; our explanations and responses are in red.
Chiropractic Leadership Alliance (CLA) has come under unfounded attack from a few hostile individuals who would like to see CLA injured. They will not succeed. Chiropractic has been under such negative smear campaigns since its inception and still stands strong.
The article did NOT attack anyone or any company. It reviewed documented evidence and discussed charges being made by state boards around the country. Dr. Gentempo's attempt to correlate this issue with anti-chiropractic campaigns during the past century is blatantly manipulative.
It is the policy of CLA to promote its products and services in a positive fashion. We choose to emphasize the value of our products and we do not initiate attacks on others. Furthermore, we do not employ half-truths, straw men, and outright falsehoods to mislead potential clients. Some of our competitors have a different way of doing business.
Is it "positive" to say that a news report is untruthful despite documented evidence to back it up? Instead of attacking the messengers, CLA could have (and should have) responded to the charges.
I am asking for your help and I urge our friends, colleagues, and clients to stand up for CLA and the truth and further, I ask that you take a stand and join us on the high road. CLAs commitment and ability to help the practicing chiropractor is needed now more than ever. Our Insight technology with its Neurospinal Function index (NSFi), coupled with our proven practice strategies for todays environment has translated into escalating success for CLA and more importantly, the DCs we serve.
Again, rather than asking doctors to blindly support CLA, why not respond to the charges?
The July 1, 2009 issue of The Chiropractic Journal has a front page article in which they attack CLA. The allegations made in this article are unfounded and we intend to set the record straight. Further, David Marcarian, who sells a product directly competitive with CLAs Insight, is given credit as the articles author. It is easy to see what type of game is being played here.
David Marcarian was asked to look into this matter because, having actually worked on NASA-related research and on sEMG technology, he was familiar with the complex issues involved. It is unfortunate that Dr. Gentempo feels simply being a competitor makes Dr. Marcarian dishonest. Most doctors and chiropractic companies enjoy a more positive and mutually supportive relationship with their "competitors" and consider them colleagues rather than enemies.
Some of the spurious allegations in this article to the uninformed reader are seemingly quite serious but in reality are preposterous. Our well earned reputation is our most precious asset, so I want to give you straight talk and evidence. It is particularly important to me that our CLA family members and colleagues know the real story. Further, a scare tactic in the article implies that owners of the Insight Subluxation Station may be at some risk for having one. This is a contemptible ploy by a competitor and is not true.
Again, this is strictly an emotional appeal without any factual rebuttal of the charges. The warnings included in the article were not "scare tactics" but based on disciplinary actions being taken and/or considered by state boards. The article never stated that any doctor was in jeopardy merely by owning or using the Subluxation Station, but by using some of the advertising verbiage used and provided by CLA.
In viewing this matter, I urge you to start by considering the sources who made the allegations:
1. The author and "lead investigator", David Marcarian, owns a company which sells a product that directly competes with CLAs Insight product.
Again, to assume an expert such as David Marcarian is dishonest simply because he competes with CLA is narrow minded. We need to examine the evidence, not attack the person who presents that evidence.
2. The Chiropractic Journal is a publication of the World Chiropractic Alliance, whose president, Richard Barwell, DC, sells another competitive product.
First of all, Dr. Barwell markets the NeuroInfiniti instrumentation, which is NOT an sEMG device. Using Dr. Gentempo's reasoning, anyone who sells any chiropractic device is CLA's "competitor" and therefore unreliable. Secondly, although Dr. Barwell is president of the World Chiropractic Alliance, he is not involved in any way in the publication of The Chiropractic Journal. He had no knowledge of or participation in the investigative report on CLA. Dr. Gentempo is once more attempting to divert attention away from the issues by attacking individuals.
3. The publisher of The Chiropractic Journal is Terry Rondberg, DC. Dr. Kent and I have completely disassociated ourselves from Rondberg some time ago due to not wanting to be associated with Rondbergs behaviors and directions.
What does this have to do with the issues at hand? Dr. Gentempo has not been involved in the WCA for years (although he continued to write for and advertise in the Journal) and Dr. Kent publicly stated that he resigned due to other commitments. During the many years that the WCA and Journal supported and publicized CLA, Dr. Gentempo never had any problem with my "behaviors and directions." When, after reviewing several different types of chiropractic devices, I chose to align myself with NeuroInfiniti, he suddenly decided to disassociate himself with me. Sadly, as Dr. Gentempo has shown repeatedly in the past, he cannot tolerate competition and looks at competitors as adversaries. I supported him for many years and have NEVER written an article criticizing or denigrating him or any CLA product or service. Now, when we dare to discuss openly the charges being leveled against the advertising claims for the Subluxation Station, he tries to suggest that my "behaviors and directions" are involved.
I know there is a likelihood that you dont read The Chiropractic Journal. At this point, I understand some of you will rightly stop reading this message and recognize that these competitors are unlikely to be an unbiased source of information and have self-serving reasons to promote misinformation. However, if these ridiculous accusations are something you have the time and inclination to get to the bottom of read on and you will observe the truth of the situation.
Again, Dr. Gentempo is using emotional manipulation to win support without addressing the real issues. If he didn't think you -- like most members of the profession -- read The Chiropractic Journal, why would he bother responding to its article?



What follows is a point-by-point refutation of the key charges from this alleged investigation. Further, at the end of this message there is a link to supportive documentation including a comprehensive timeline of events which sets the record straight.

Let me summarize:
1. CLA has not made any misrepresentations to NASA.
How can Dr. Gentempo make such a claim? Here are just a few of the statements on the Internet used by CLA and clients about the Subluxation Station:
"The technology - known as the Insight Discovery Subluxation Station - was born from a partnership between NASA and the Chiropractic Leadership Alliance (CLA), a New Jersey-based company."
"The Insight uses technology developed for NASA to measure the effects of space on the spines of space shuttle astronauts."
"Technology That Has Been Used By NASA: The Insight Subluxation Station objectively evaluates patterns of spinal and nerve function."
"Its space experiment based technology is called the Insight Subluxation Station and is a neurospinal screening and evaluation system based on the NASA research conducted by Brody and the SEMG methodology."
"Spinal care technology developed for astronauts is now available for better chiropractic care."
"We have invested fully into our practice to better the health of our practice members and purchased the Insight Millennium Subluxation Station which was certified by the space foundation and co-founded with NASA."
"We are pleased to use NASA certified technology. Each person is examined by the Insight Subluxation Station, a non intrusive technology which is a neuro-spinal screening and evaluation system originally designed to measure changes in the spinal muscles of astronauts."
"The Insight Subluxation Station, which is certified by the Space Foundation in cooperation with NASA, helps us to identify these problems before they become symptomatic."
2. CLA applied for and was granted Space Certification for the Insight. Our Space Certification is valid and in full force (click link to see letter from the Space Foundation).
No one disputes that CLA was "granted" a Space Certification by the Space Foundation. The issue concerned the misrepresentation by CLA and some of its clients that the Foundation is directly associated with NASA when it is, in fact, a totally private organization that charges substantial fees for its "Certification" and markets that certification as an effective sales tool. The charges against CLA involve the suggestion that the certification was granted by NASA. The Space Foundation is a highly respected and excellent program but it was neither co-founded by nor is officially connected to NASA.
3. Space Certification is not the same as NASA Spinoff status. CLA did not apply for NASA Spinoff status - NASA gave it to us after performing its own due diligence.
Again, no one denies that Spinoff magazine granted the Subluxation Station status as a "space technology spinoff." However, that status was withdrawn after a NASA investigation revealed there was no basis for such status.
4. The Space Foundation, a non-profit entity, DOES work in cooperation with NASA.
A review of the Space Foundation website reveals that is has no official connection with NASA. While it, like many space-related organizations, may work "in cooperation with" NASA, it is NOT part of the US space agency.
5. The Insight is manufactured in an FDA registered facility and is an FDA-registered Class II medical device. The registered indications for use are consistent with our chiropractic applications and protocols. Documentation can be accessed per:
The Chiropractic Journal acknowledged that the Subluxation Station has an FDA 510(k) registration. The report simply pointed out that, contrary to public belief, that does NOT mean the device was tested and/or found to be either safe or effective. The 510(k) registration simply means that a device demonstrates a "substantial equivalence" to a device marketed before 1976, when the Medical Device Amendment was passed. CLA clients are using claims such as:
"We start your evaluation using a high-tech, FDA-approved diagnostic tool known as the Insight Millennium Subluxation Station..."
"The Insight Subluxation Station is an advanced, state-of-the-art instrument certified by The Space Foundation in cooperation with NASA, is FDA and Health Canada registered..."
"(The doctor) uses the Insight Subluxation Station, a state-of-the-art, NASA-certified and FDA-approved technology to perform outcome assessment studies ..."
Referring to the device as "FDA approved" is inaccurate and misleading to the public and such claims are also being investigated by several state boards.
6. There is no reason to believe that any doctor is legally or financially at risk for promoting the Insight based on its Space Certification and status as an FDA Registered, Class II Medical Device. These are facts. It is really a low-brow tactic for a competitor to try to scare our clients in such an unscrupulous way.
Dr. Gentempo has very carefully worded this statement. He does NOT deny that doctors can be legally and/or financially at risk for promoting the Subluxation Station as a NASA-developed or FDA "approved" device. It is clear that they ARE being held accountable for such false advertising.
I think our competitors actions and motives here are quite transparent. I trust your ability to judge for yourself.
This is NOT about CLA's perceived "competitors." State boards are NOT in a conspiracy against CLA nor is anyone else. But there is a great need to address these serious concerns and Dr. Gentempo is failing to do so.
CLAs track record speaks for itself. I invite you to check the facts. CLAs passionate purpose is to support you by revolutionizing the practice and perception of chiropractic worldwide. We envision world leadership of healthcare in a chiropractic model. We care about you, the DC and staff in the field, working hard to bring the chiropractic lifestyle to those in your community. The last thing we need is this kind of undignified behavior dragging everyone down while those perpetrating it try to increase their personal gain at the expense of every hard working chiropractor. Check the facts. Read the literature. Call if you have questions.
CLA has an excellent track record and has contributed a great deal to the chiropractic profession. The Subluxation Station has served doctors well for many years, as have Drs. Gentempo and Kent. No one is disputed any of that. The ONLY issue being scrutinized involves the advertising claims being made that can put doctors in jeopardy. A review of the marketing claims made by CLA and some of its clients show clearly that they contain false and/or misleading statements.
In closing, I again ask all the friends and clients of CLA to please stand up for us by setting the record straight for anyone you come in contact with that brings this issue up and to further express your outrage toward those who are trying to undermine what is good for this profession and its future.
Why should friends and clients of CLA set the record straight when CLA itself refuses to address the problems concerning the false and misleading claims being made about the Subluxation Station. A simple statement noting that some of the claims were, in fact, inaccurate, out of date, or misleading, could have prevented the board actions, this investigation, and the ongoing turmoil involving the device. When you make a mistake, admit it, correct it, and go on from there.



During the last days of the reign of terror of Big $id Williams, he had alienated most of his DE Dudes, ICA colleagues, sycophants and faculty from Life. Lawsuits were flying around from disgruntled students and staff.

The same can be seen now with TR: Just how many lawsuits has he filed or has had filed against him recently? David Jackson ended his lawsuit, but can't comment because TR is afraid for the profession to learn his case was totally bogus and thrown out by the judge. Incidentally, Jackson's co-defendent is now suing TR for $300,000 for court costs and wrongful lawsuit.

Obviously TR is desperate as he watches his alliance of cards crumble. Publicly fighting with Gentempo is the last straw and indicates TR's modus operandi to hurt people who were once close to him.

Hopefully as TR's ship continues to sink, more WCA rats will jump overboard and reveal the many machinations of this mad man. If nothing else, TR has kept his attorney, Carlos Negrete, well funded.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to

Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard